Having finally trudged through the post-holiday backlog of email, I ignored the pile of freshly printed reading to surf the crisis in the Horn of Africa. I found an Al Jazeera story which I would call interesting on two counts. First, for the fact of it. And second, for the invisibility of that fact (i.e., that even people following the aid biz didn’t seem to notice).
The story is a fairly simple one, and I recommend reading the author’s full analysis. In August, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan visited a camp for starving IDPs in Mogadishu. Can you imagine being equally unaware of a Sarkozy or Cameron visit to Somalia? Or a UN ambassador like Angelina Jolie? I mean, there’s more coverage of Obama eating a hotdog (actually, a chilidog, which is definitely more macho). The visit was the move of a true world leader. Not only the first non-African head of state to see Somalia in over 20 years, Erdogan took his wife and daughter, a clear statement that the war-torn capital of Somalia is not necessarily the Call of Duty shooting gallery we make it out to be.
The fact of this visit, though, is more interesting than the media non-coverage. Here is the new direction not just of Turkey, but of the next wave of world players. Countries like India, China, Qatar, Brazil and South Africa. Countries that are heading to Africa for profit, influence, minerals and for the prestige long accorded to powerful Western nations/leaders doing the philanthropic waddle. Erdogan’s visit was accompanied (already some weeks ago) by roughly $250M in Turkish donations to the crisis, mostly from the Turkish public. I think (too late for dinner to research it) that’s more than UK public donations.
That fact alone speaks of a world that is changing faster than we imagine or plan. I think of non-Western governments increasing their humanitarian spend, but actual public compassion and donation? That’s supposed to be our Western genome, a unique manifestation of our goodness and superiority. Apparently, there are even Turkish celebrities who play the humanitarian ambassador role, meaning you can see non-terrorist Omar Sharif looking guys visiting camps as well. (Please don’t comment, I know Sharif wasn’t Turkish or a terrorist and I don’t really believe that all guys with thick black mustaches look alike).
To me, our Western thinking on aid still hasn’t grasped the sheer acceleration of the entry of other actors – governmental donors, aid organizations, and concerned publics – to the global arena of humanitarian action. These actors don’t have colonial histories, don’t suffer the white man’s burden, don’t seek to moralize about human rights violations, and don’t necessarily subscribe to a model of aid based on charity. All good news. I’m thinking there could even be a job in this after MSF, working for one of the new global humanitarian leaders.
According to this article the Britons donated £42m. Quite a difference with the $250m. Especially if you know that the population figures of both countries are roughly the same.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14382990